User talk:RA0808/Archives2020/September

Re: Heat_death_of_the_universe

Hello RA,

Apologies for contacting you here, but it seems that one particular vandal is at work again. Heat_death_of_the_universe has been mangled. I don't know enough about editing back to revert the damage, but the additions/changes by Dlku4d seem anything but reliable and well-sourced (or even relevant!)

Thanks for all your help,

DL67 (talk) 20:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)DL67

Do not edit war their page

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bex_Taylor-Klaus&oldid=853520281 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bex_Taylor-Klaus&oldid=872935372 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bex_Taylor-Klaus&oldid=879959633 Are your sources. Be more polite.Mantr33r (talk) 13:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Mantr33r: No one is being rude to you, nor am I engaging in an edit war. Please note that you cannot use Wikipedia as a source for other Wikipedia articles, this is to avoid circular referencing (see WP:CIRC for more details). I'm sure that you can find a source describing Taylor-Klaus' sex at birth and add content to the article that way. Also, claiming that editors are pushing a political agenda or deliberately obfuscating information is not conducive to a collaborative atmosphere. If in doubt open a discussion at the article's talk page to reach consensus. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 14:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Why

Why would you not allow images of certain crossdressers and do allow images of others? Your descisions on the pages are not based on logic but on pure taste. And will make sure this is known Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sissyjoyce12: The images already in use in those articles serve an encyclopedic purpose to illustrate the concept. Your replacement of these established images (seemingly with images of yourself or someone you are affiliated with) does not serve any additional encyclopedic purpose to justify the changes besides seemingly self-promotion. If you are coming to this with an approach of good faith improvements to Wikipedia then I definitely recommend starting a discussion on one of the appropriate WikiProjects and develop a consensus of where improvements are most needed. Hope this helps, RA0808 ^talk_contribs 16:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

complete bullshit. Do you have ownership of the picture you uploaded on the sissy page? And the picture that i have there is a way clearer and informative picture then that idiotic one you just uploaded. Don´t be like that lol. Very sad to see. I WILL report this. Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The picture YOU posted in the sissy page can easily be mistakes for a regular crossdresser. The one i posted even has a collar with the word sissy on it. Seriously. And stop the blaming for self promotion. Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

"Seemingly" self promotion. Nice one Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

. Sissyjoyce12 (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Nightingale reed warbler

I updated the page since ICAN says it is extinct but you undid my edit I supposed you were confused with the Saipan reed warbler that also lived on the island and is still living — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivian934 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Vivian934: Hi Vivian, the only reason I reverted your edit is that it made an assertion about it being "likely extirpated" without providing a source. I know that based on the IUCN status that is probably correct but we can't use synthesis or original research so it just needs a source to have that statement added back in. Hope this helps! RA0808 ^talk_contribs 16:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok, bro

Thanks. The rambler who added the paragraph I mentioned also added his ramblings on a few other pages as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.76.2.123 (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you! ^_^ Angus1986 TALK 17:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Re: Julia Salazar

You call it nonconstructive, reality calls it truth. What was wikipedia supposed to be, again? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/14/opinion/julia-salazar-socialism-democrats.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.1.114.34 (talk) 18:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a blog or soapbox. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 18:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Entry for C. Clark Kissinger

I added the fact that Kissinger is the father of geneticist Jessica Kissinger (who also has an entry in wikipedia). You removed it because it was not sourced. What would constitute a source in this case? A birth certificate?

C. Clark Kissinger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.37.120.228 (talk) 14:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there and thanks for your message. Any publicly-available reliable source that references she is his daughter will be fine. For example a newspaper article about either saying something like "Kissinger, the daughter of activist C. Clark Kissinger". Please see Wikipedia's policy on verifiability for more details. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 14:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Entry for C. Clark Kissinger

I added the fact that Kissinger is the father of geneticist Jessica Kissinger (who also has an entry in wikipedia). You removed it because it was not sourced. What would constitute a source in this case? A birth certificate?

C. Clark Kissinger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.37.120.228 (talk) 14:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there and thanks for your message. Any publicly-available reliable source that references she is his daughter will be fine. For example a newspaper article about either saying something like "Kissinger, the daughter of activist C. Clark Kissinger". Please see Wikipedia's policy on verifiability for more details. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 14:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)